Saturday 14 September 2013

In Defense of Urban Agriculture



In recent years urban agriculture has become more popular across the western world, [1] with increasing numbers of city farms, allotments and urban gardens being used as planning tools in large cities.

There has been controversy surrounding the benefit of urban farms; suggestions that these spaces only serve an urban elite, complaints about the snobbery of foodies, and claims that these spaces are little more than gentrification and land-grabbing tools.  Alongside these complaints it has been suggested that these spaces will never be able to feed the cities where they are being established – so why bother?

At the same time there has been a parallel focus on programs that 'green the ghetto' - trying to make environmental fixes in deprived areas.  While these projects should be applauded for trying to beautify public space and for their desire to create more inhabitable neighborhoods, they often come up short as a comprehensive response to poverty.  

Many new food-growing projects are trying to take on multiple goals, with more nuanced plans to attack the various problems presented by the 'ghetto'.  We now see urban agriculture projects that try to address the economic disparities that lead to the environmental problems, as well as a multiplicity of social problems - Bad health, joblessness, poor education, and a basic lack of opportunities.  In this way these projects stop being hobbies, and become tools for creating urban resilience.

For the last 4 years I have been working on urban food issues and food justice projects across the Tri-state area.  The largest of these projects is an urban farm and food justice project in the South Ward of Newark.  I would like to use my experience with this project to introduce some information about the potential benefits that urban farms can provide, and why we should value these spaces.


SWAG Project (www.facebook.com/SWAGProject) started in 2010 when Planting Seeds of Hope, a NJ based NPO partnered with my planning consultancy Amplify to build an urban farm and educational space on the property of a local Hebrew Israelite Tabernacle. SWAG Project serves it’s surrounding neighborhood by supplying fresh organic produce, offering hands-on education in agriculture and nutrition, piloting entrepreneurial activities, and building stronger community ties among neighbors.

First, some quick background on the area surrounding the farm.  Newark is the 2nd poorest city in New Jersey, with 30% of its residents living below the poverty line[2].  Since the 1960’s, it has experienced urban decline similar to other northern industrial cities; a shrinking job market, followed by a shrinking population and white flight, deterioration of housing stock, and crime and joblessness rates well above the state and national average. Food poverty is also rampant, with high numbers of the population receiving SNAP/WIC assistance (food stamps), and a high incidence of residents dipping in and out of food insecurity.   Much of Newark can also be considered a food desert or swamp.[3]

Our specific neighborhood, Weequhaic has a high poverty rate, underfunded and understaffed local schools and lack of quality jobs and activities for young adults.  It’s residents also face unhealthy food choices and inadequate nutrition knowledge. There are few restaurants, corner stores, or groceries and most sell high calorie and/or fast foods.  Furthermore, few of them are within walking distance (less than a mile). Our neighborhood also lacks a local community center or emergency food center within a 2-mile radius. 

Enter SWAG Project.  In our 4 years in the community, with a shoe-string budget, but an excellent volunteer base, we have: built a ¼ acre farm growing a combined 3,400 lbs of food (1,500 last year alone) begun renovations on our building to act as a community center, hosted over 150 group education visits, engaged over 200 non-Newark visitors and volunteers, brought our community together for farm dinners and harvest celebrations, beautified our local neighborhood, and completed planning for a commercial greenhouse that will make us more financially self-sustaining by 2016.  In this way able to address some of the problems facing our community. The goal of the following sections is to give you a brief overview of how my farm, and really, any urban farm, can be valuable to the community.  I will talk about the benefits across 4 areas:  healthy food production and provision, Educational opportunities, community building, and community beautification. 


Healthy Food Production and Provision
For a small farm, we are very productive.  Last year was our 3rd year, and we managed to grow 1,500lbs of fruits and vegetables (that's 680 kilos) on about 800 sq ft of space.  This year our space has tripled and we are hoping to grow over 4,000 lbs of food.  That's almost 3,750 servings of fruit and vegetables.[4] While this is not enough to feed our entire neighborhood, we are able to supplement the local food supply.  We run an onsite market for the neighborhood and donate the remainder to local emergency food providers.  Last year we had over 200 visitors to our market and were also able to provide all the fresh food for our 80-person farm dinner.  We do this at a fair price, charging less than most corner stores do for the produce, and well below what boutique groceries in more affluent neighborhoods charge.

An additional benefit to our being a food producer for our local residents is that the food doesn’t need to travel far to reach the table.  This gives people with low levels of access to food a direct source in their neighborhood, saving residents travel time (often upwards of 45 minutes), and providing them access to fresh, organic foods that most of the local corner stores do not carry. We are a source of chemical free and GMO free, organically grown fruits and vegetables. There is no organic market or store in our neighborhood, nor, as previously explained, a real full-scale grocery store.  Furthermore, since our fruits and vegetables haven’t traveled for weeks to reach their destination, they maintain their full nutritional value.



Educational Opportunities and Training
In the last 4 years our farm has partnered with the two local schools and hosted over 150 hands-on education classes (engaging with over 1,500 children from the local area alone) and run ongoing youth farmer workshop for 3 consecutive years.  Our classes focus on getting the kids to understand the importance of farms, where their food comes from, and also encourages them to work and get dirty.  (Most schools in our local area no longer have gym classes or a recess.)  Over the winter we focus on cooking and nutrition workshops to get the kids excited about eating and to teach them what’s healthy and how to prepare it.

Nutrition and farm education extends to adults as well.  We realized that many of our residents had lost touch with cooking their own food, or, weren’t sure what it really meant to eat healthy, or how to translate family recipes and cultural favorites into more nutritious meals.  We spent the last few years working with one of the local chefs to set up cooking and nutrition classes for adults.  We have also run a healthy living campaign extending our activities on site to include yoga and hip-hop dance classes to get the community involved and active, and partnering with the local YMCA to talk about obesity and other local health issues.

The final part of our education piece is farmer training.  Many local adults have come by to learn how to grow their own food.  We have managed to create two paid (part-time) jobs on the farm - a farm manager and an education assistant.  In the following years we will be building a hydroponic greenhouse and offering local adults and teens the opportunity to learn business and farming skills that will allow them to move into the green economy.



Creating Cohesion and Building Community
One of the biggest challenges we have faced is breaking down barriers in a distrustful community faced with crime and disenchanted with the idea of the friendly neighbor.   When we started the farm, the residents in the surrounding neighborhood did not interact much with one another and there was a large fence that surrounded the entire property to keep residents out.  It took us a year to convince the property owners to take it down.  This effort proved to be more than symbolic, although it took us another 3 years to get the majority of the community involved. 

In the beginning, people were wary of the religious group we work with, now they trust us and have become familiar with the Hebrew Israelites who host the farm.  Now residents bring their kids in to see our vegetables grow and attend our community dinners and classes.  In spring, students from a local mosque came and planted trees with our team, and the Baptist church nearby raised funds to help build our second farm. Sharing stories about food from their countries lead our Guianese and Jamaican neighbors to bring seeds for our farmer to plant; it lead the congregation to put together a cookbook with recipes from local residents. All this in a community where people didn’t say hello to us or their neighbors 4 years ago.  Although the police still stop by to check on me as a woman (and a white one at that) in a ‘dangerous’ neighborhood, they now also stop by to get food from the market.  Food did this; Farming did this.  Working hard side-by-side to move dirt, build berms, plant seeds and maintain the farm allowed our neighbors to get to know each other on their terms.



Community Beautification
One of the nicest benefits to our direct community has been the addition of a safe, open space for people to visit.  At the farm we have been able to create a space where the local school children can visit, and a place where neighbors feel comfortable stopping by to chat with members of the project.  We have also managed to get a number of the young men who had previously been hanging around the block, smoking and drinking, to come in an volunteer, as well as keeping an eye on the property while our team members cannot be there.  The kids who we worked with the last few years at school now feel ownership in their community.  Two years ago we painted a mural with the help of a local artist, and the farm now stands as a place in the community that people are proud to talk about.  Moreover, our work on the property has encouraged the congregants to raise money to fix the deteriorating building, and other homeowners have come to us for advice on planting their own gardens and how to improve their yards.  In this way we have had an effect on the larger community, encouraging others to begin caring more for the neighborhood as well.

Our end goal is to build a community development corporation and launch a combination of green economy and food-based commercial initiatives to ensure a financially sustainable future of community development activities. By creating a local food and health oriented CDC, we will ultimately be able to continue to support the projects broader objectives; improving health, economic activity, education, and strengthening community ties.

I am not giving our organization as an example of what every community should do, nor am I purporting that our project has solved all the problems within our community.  Rather, I would suggest that community run urban farming projects can be, and grow into, institutions that take on the myriad of problems facing many impoverished inner cities.  I suggest that these spaces have value to cities in their ability to improve health, provide educational and economic opportunities, and also to beautify and bring together communities.





[1] People in the global south have long grown their own food in urban areas and continue to do so, the new media and social phenomena of the urban garden or farm is only novel or ‘new’ the western and northern hemispheres
[2] According to 2010 ACS data (U.S. Census American Community Survey)
[3] Food Deserts are areas with little to no access to food (aka restaurants, grocery stores, etc.  Food Swamps were are areas where people have high levels of access to unhealthy, calorie dense foods.
[4] The USDA recommends that youths eat 2 cups of fresh fruits and vegetables a day, and adults between 2-3 cups.

Thursday 18 April 2013

According to Nestle, Water isn't a Human Right



Recently, Nestle Chairman Peter Brabeck made the astonishing claim (while being interviewed for the documentary We Feed the World), that water IS NOT a human right. He goes on to attack the idea that nature is good, and details what a great achievement it is that humans are now able 'to resist nature's dominance.'  While there are a plethora of arguments against the above summary of his claims, and in fact against the detailed views he describes in the interview, I would like to take time quickly to posit the main issues/ questions I have with his arguments (on both an environmental and social level):


 
1) Are human beings not both a part of nature and dependent on nature (our environment) to live? Have we not moved past the archaic thought process that believes man was put on earth to dominate nature? Do we continue to think that nature is here to be bent to our will or suppressed under our feet?  At what point did our Judeo-Christian paradigm fail to capture the more subtle message of humans as caretakers and stewards of the earth?  (See any of Wendell Berry’s writings on agrarian lifestyles.)


2) Are we really to blind to see that we, as individuals and groups, are truly powerless to control nature, and that in most of our manipulations we only serve to make the environment worse for ourselves? 


3) If we do not believe that human beings have a right to clean, drinkable water, one of the only things we truly need to remain alive, then what sort of rights do we actually believe in? And how can they possibly matter? If we do not believe that people have the basic right to things that will allow them to live, what sort of a farce are all the other tenets we set up to guarantee people other basic freedoms?

4) Will we continue to back the 'right' of corporations to do whatever they like in the noble name of capitalism and wealth accumulation?  Have we really not reached a point where we can weight the rights of human beings over corporations, and our wellbeing over that of a small group of people’s ability to profit?  Nestle is the biggest distributor of bottled water the world over.  Mr. Barbek has stated, correctly, that water is the most valuable resource worldwide.  However, his idea that privatization will make sure it is most fairly distributed is nonsensical.  Since when have markets actually ensured an equitable distribution of any good?

I posit these questions more as a jumping off point for a more nuanced conversation about what our rights and responsibilities are to one another and to our environment.  

To view the trailer for the documentary, We Feed the World, click here.

Tuesday 12 February 2013

God made a Farmer: How Current Commercial Ideals About Farming Channel the Dominant Food Narrative


The below text is a reproduction of a letter and article by Eric Holt-Giménez

The spoofs on the “God Made a Farmer” Super Bowl commercial are starting to go viral. Their takes on Dodge RAM’s two-minute homily suggest the automaker may have irked as many people as it pleased: God made a (factory) farmerGod made a (woman) farmerGod made a Farm (worker).

The commercial is based on a speech given thirty-five years ago to the Future Farmers of America—about the time half of the country’s family farmers were going bankrupt. It was the onset of “free” markets, giant feedlots, GMOs, global warming, obesity epidemics, the massive migration of Third World farmers and the unprecedented rise of the great global food monopolies. It was the dark dawn of the corporate food regime.

None of this, of course, is addressed in the commercial. Commercials are for selling products, not for educating us about the food system. Right?

Wrong.

Commercials are about winning hearts and minds in order to sell things.  They tap in to our desires and our belief systems from a very early age. In this sense, they are part of our ongoing ideological education. They reinforce the mythologies that shape our understanding of the world.

In “God made a Farmer” Dodge RAM tapped into national agrarian nostalgia by wrapping its product in one of our society’s great mythologies: the Dominant Food Narrative.
The Dominant Food Narrative goes something like this:
Through rugged individualism, entrepreneurship, technological superiority and free markets, today’s industrial food system is the most productive in history. While not perfect, it is the best way to feed the world.

This set of assumptions contains an important, unspoken assumption:
Without the industrial food system, we’re all going to die.

The unspoken assumption is the most powerful of all because it holds all the others together with the sticky glue of fear. The Dominant Food Narrative allows a broad set of myths and claims to be presented as facts. (First exposed in Frances Moore Lappé’s “12 Myths About World Hunger.”)

The Dominant Food Narrative is good at selling products, and not just trucks. It sells GMOs, CAFOs, and agrofuels.  It sells policies like the Farm Bill and global campaigns like the new Green Revolution and Feed the Future. It sells plenty of politicians…  

The other important thing that the Dominant Food Narrative does is to make things invisible.  For example, “God made a Famer” makes farmworkers, women, land grabs and factory farming all invisible. It also makes alternatives to the industrial food system—like agroecology, CSAs, and urban farms—invisible by denying their achievements in hopes that no one will take them seriously. This reinforces the other unspoken assumption crafted thunderously into the Dominant Food Narrative:

“There is No Alternative.”
Practices that deviate from industrial agriculture (read: do not consume its products), science that is not at the service of the industrial food system (agroecology) and experiences that contradict the dominant food narrative (Campesino a CampesinoCuba , Rodale), must be dismissed as non-existent, impractical or even “elitist” in order to ensure the dominance of the industrial food system.

But the Dominant Food Narrative is crumbling. It is harder and harder to hide the superweeds, diet-related diseases, land grabs, racism and global suffering intrinsic to the corporate food regime. More and more people can see the Food Emperor had no clothes. The Dominant Food Narrative may sell trucks, but it is getting harder to sell GMOs, processed food and the beneficence of Wal-Mart,

Other food narratives are emerging from other practices that not only challenge the old narrative, they make us realize that there plenty of alternatives to the industrial food system. Around the world, communities are showing that the practices and the narratives can be changed to serve other purposes rather than food for monopoly profit.

The next step will be to change the rules and institutions governing our food system so that these “alternative” practices become the norm.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE ORIGINAL TEXT OF PAUL HARVEY TALKING ABOUT THE AMERICAN FARMER:

And on the 8th day God looked down on his planned paradise and said, "I need a caretaker." So, God made a farmer.

God said I need somebody to get up before dawn and milk cows and work all day in the fields, milk cows again, eat supper and then go to town and stay past midnight at a meeting of the school board. So, God made a farmer.

I need somebody with strong arms. Strong enough to rustle a calf, yet gentle enough to deliver his own grandchild. Somebody to call hogs, tame cantankerous machinery, come home hungry and have to wait for lunch until his wife is done feeding and visiting with the ladies and telling them to be sure to come back real soon...and mean it. So, God made a farmer.

God said "I need somebody that can shape an ax handle, shoe a horse with a hunk of car tire make a harness out of hay wire, feed sacks and shoe scraps. And...who, at planting time and harvest season, will finish his forty hour week by Tuesday noon. Then, pain'n from "tractor back", put in another seventy two hours. So, God made a farmer.

God had to have somebody willing to ride the ruts at double speed to get the hay in ahead of the rain clouds and yet stop on mid-field and race to help when he sees the first smoke from a neighbor's place. So, God made a farmer.

God said, "I need somebody strong enough to clear trees, heave bails and yet gentle enough to tame lambs and wean pigs and tend the pink combed pullets...and who will stop his mower for an hour to mend the broken leg of a meadow lark. So, God made a farmer.

It had to be somebody who'd plow deep and straight...and not cut corners. Somebody to seed and weed, feed and breed...and rake and disc and plow and plant and tie the fleece and strain the milk. Somebody to replenish the self feeder and then finish a hard days work with a five mile drive to church. Somebody who'd bale a family together with the soft strong bonds of sharing, who'd laugh and then sigh...and then respond with smiling eyes, when his son says he wants to spend his life "doing what dad does". So, God made a farmer.